意识形态作为一种隐形的力量对文学创作和翻译实践具有操纵性。辜鸿铭的儒经翻译极具特色,传统的译论标准很难对辜鸿铭的译本作出恰当的评论,而意识形态对翻译具有操纵性这一视角为重新审视辜氏的译作提供了新的思路。以辜鸿铭的《论语》和《中庸》的译本为研究文本,不难发现意识形态对辜鸿铭的翻译活动进行了无形的操纵,主要表现在译者对原著的选择和译者对翻译策略的选择上。

Ideology ,as an invisible power ,manipulates the literature and translation .Ku Hung-Ming′s English translations of Confucian classics are very special ,however ,the traditional translation criteria ,which usually focus on the comparison between the source text and target texts ,can′t give a very reasonable explanation .While Ideological Manipulation of the translation shows us a new perspective to analyze Ku′s translations .This paper examines Ku′s translations of Lunyu and Zhongyong to reveal how ideology manipulates the process of translation in the aspects of the choice of source text and the choice of the translation strategy .

辜鸿铭作为一个晚清留洋学者，其“西学”在中国的贯彻实施却未必比严复等人更彻底，思想反而趋于保守与矛盾。文章通过对“五四”时期辜鸿铭的中西文化观的解读及其反思，可以看到，他反对“五四”运动，而宣传“中学”与旧礼；他提倡“中国文化优越论”，与当时的“中西调和论”与“复古主义”和而不同，从而折射出在“五四”时期中西文化冲突剧烈的背景下，部分中国学者对近代中国文化的走向所持有的矛盾心态和复杂情愫。

GU Hong-ming,who studied abroad at the late Qing Dynasty,was more conser-vative than YAN fu.By analyzing his interpretation of Chinese and Western culture at the May 4th period,his idea,against the May 4th Movement,was for“Chinese philosophy” and tradition. His idea of“Chinese cultural centralism” is close but different from the theory of “Chinese-Western integration” and“back-to-ancient doctrine”.This reflects some Chinese scholars’ con-tradiction and complexity regarding the future trend of Chinese culture at that special historical background.

《中庸》英译本层出不穷，通过横向对比三个译本的重点篇章译本，从翻译方法入手，分析理雅各、辜鸿铭和安乐哲/郝大维的翻译策略和翻译目的，为中国经典著作的英译及鉴赏提供有益补充。

Although there are a few English versions of the Doctrine of the Mean, each has its own characteristics and translation purpose. In this text, key chapters of this book are analyzed contrastively and the translation methods and strategies in three ver-sions are found out, so that it’s hopeful to make a contribution to the development and appreciation of the Chinese classics.

“忠实”是众多译者所追求的翻译目标，也是译本好坏的评价标准。本着让西方人改变对中国的态度，辜鸿铭的英译《论语》采用了高度归化的翻译策略，通过运用增译、改译和加注的方法，巧妙引进了诸多西方事物对儒家经典予以阐释。该文从目的论视角分析了辜氏译文的各种翻译策略，总结出其译文是忠实于原文的。

Faithfulness, as the standard of evaluating translated version, is the goal that many translators work for. For the purpose of making the westerners change their attitude toward China, Ku Hung-ming adopted the domesticating strategy to translate the Discourses and Sayings of Confucius, which is best exemplified in the methods of addition, adaptation and adding notes. What''s more, he also skillfully integrated many western things and sayings in the English version so as to exactly illustrate Confucian clas-sics. Through analyzing Ku''s English version from the perspective of Skopos Theory, this paper concludes that his translation is faithful to the original text.

以理雅各1885年《中庸》英译本和辜鸿铭的《中庸》英译本为研究对象,以刘宓庆先生的翻译美学理论为指导,用其所倡导的ABC审美原则为依据,从词汇层面分析对比了两个译本,再现两位译者翻译时所面临的困境,指出其中些许瑕疵,为未来译者翻译出更美的《中庸》译本提供参考。

Guided by the Translation Aesthetics ,especially the ABC Principles ,proposed by Mr .Liu Miqing ,this pa‐per comparatively studies the English versions of Zhongyong translated by Legge in 1885 and Ku Hongming respectively from the lexical level ,aiming to re‐present the dilemma the two translators confronted ,point out some flaws ,and pro‐voke the appearance of more beautiful English translation of Zhongyong .