登录

双语推荐:吴敬梓

《儒林外史》与明代社会关系密切.吴敬梓何以厚洪武而薄永乐,是和洪武朝礼乐制度的建立有关,而永乐篡位本身即是对周礼的违背,且自此之后,礼乐制度废弛.高启桀骜不驯,其性格与魏晋人物类似,吴敬梓推崇六朝,但由文中所及《高青丘文集》看,吴敬梓对高启极为熟悉,从其个人及文中王冕行迹看,吴敬梓及其创作受高启影响更大.明代文人结社之风盛行,清代对于明人结社态度多为否定,吴敬梓当受特定时代思潮影响,对文人结社也比较反对.《儒林外史》涉及文人结社颇多,且多为反面,这一现象当与吴敬梓个人态度有关.
The novel The Scholars was closely related to the society of the Ming Dynasty. Why did its author prefer Hongwu (1368-1398) to Yongle (1403-1424)? It was because of the establishment of the system of rites and music in Hongwu period of the Ming Dynasty. Moreover, Zhu Di usurped the throne, thus defying the rites of the Zhou Dynasty. Wu Jingzi, author of The Scholars, was against the practice of forming associations, which was very popular in the Yongle period of the Qing Dynasty. Therefore, what has in the novel was set in the Ming Dynasty.

[ 可能符合您检索需要的词汇 ]

吴敬梓的《儒林外史》作为中国讽刺文学的巅峰之作,是通过小说来对现实生活进行评价的典型例子。小说使用现实主义手法刻画了各类人士对于“功名富贵”的不同表现,选家就是其中一类。本篇论文将选家作为研究对象,着重从选家产生的历史背景,以马二先生、匡超人、蘧公孙为代表的选家形象分析以及作者吴敬梓和小说中的人物对选家的态度这三个方面进行撰写,以进一步深化小说主题。
"The scholars" by Wu Jingzi, as a culmination work of satire, is a typical example of real life evaluation through the novel. The novel uses realism to depict the different performance of all kinds of people for the"fame and wealth", and Xuan Jia is one of this kind. This paper takes Xuan Jia as the research object, and is emphatically writ-ten from the three aspects, that is the historical background of Xuan Jia, the analysis of the image of Xuan Jia repre-sented by Mr Maer, Kuang Chaoren, and Qu Gongsun, and attitude to Xuan Jia by the author, Wu Jingzi, and the characters in the novel, in order to futher deepen the novel''s theme.

[ 可能符合您检索需要的词汇 ]

以杜少卿为代表的真儒士是封建主流文化下的"流浪汉",他们离经叛道,游离于正统之外,以其不被世人接受的"雅趣"在充斥"俗习"的社会中踽踽独行。从更深层次来看,吴敬梓乃是当世社会最大的"流浪汉",不仅仅杜少卿是其"自况",庄绍光、虞育德、市井五奇人均或多或少地体现着作者的思想和行为特征;吴敬梓始终将自己置于幕后,但小说中又处处有他的身影,小说人物的雅趣,便也是作者未言明的雅趣。
True Confucian scholar represented by Du Shaoqing was the tramp in feudal mainstream culture, discarding the classics and rebelling against orthodoxy and being away from the orthodox. As a result, they traveled alone in the secular society for their elegant taste, which was not be accepted by common people. But beneath the surface, Wu Jingzi was the biggest tramp in historical society; Not only Wu compared himself to Du Shaoqing, but also Zhuang Shaoguang,Yu Yude and five street wonders gave expression to Wu’s ideas and behaviors more or less. Wu put himself behind the scenes all the time, but his figure could be saw in the novel;that is to say, how elegance the characters are, how Wu’s elegance is.

[ 可能符合您检索需要的词汇 ]

刘大櫆以诗文流芳,吴敬梓以小说传世。二人生活时代相同,地缘相近,人生经历和思想认识有诸多相通之处。特别是两人都分别通过不同方式对科举制度的弊端进行了有力的揭露和批判,在时代进步中发挥了积极作用。通过对他们的科举经历和科举观加以比较,既有利于我们全面客观地认识刘大櫆的思想全貌及历史地位,也有利于我们理解和研究吴敬梓及《儒林外史》,从而更好地看清两人生活时代科举制度对知识分子的禁锢和摧残。
Liu Dakui is famous for his poems ,while Wu Jingzi is known to the world for his novels .The two contemporaries who lived not far from each other have a lot in common so far as their life experiences and philosophy are concerned .Especially ,both of them have sharply re‐vealed and criticized the abuses of Imperial Examination ,w hich has played a positive role in the social progress .The comparison between their life experiences and philosophy of Imperial Exami‐nation will make scholars realize the general philosophy of Liu Dakui and his importance in histo‐ry .Thereby ,the understanding and research of Wu Jingzi and his The Scholars can be promoted and the slavery and devastation of the Imperial Examination policy on the scholars of their era can be observed .

[ 可能符合您检索需要的词汇 ]