西方著名“马克思学”家伊林·费切尔在中国的出场形式主要表现在论文、辞典和所译介的他本人的论文和著作三个方面；国内学术界对其思想的研究主要涉及费切尔的马恩关系观、对早期马克思与晚期马克思关系的认识、马克思与黑格尔关系观、对苏东剧变原因的分析、对马克思主义社会主义的认识以及费切尔在西方马克思学形成中的作用等六个方面。总的来说，国内对伊林·费切尔的研究存在三方面的不足，即没有针对费切尔的专门研究、对其著作和论文翻译不够、学术研究性不强。

Iring Fetscher is the well-known western marxologist .His appearance forms in China were mainly in the pa-per ,dictionary and his papers and works .The research about Iring Fetscher in domestic academic circles are mainly concerned with his View of relationship between Marx and Engels ,the knowledge of relationship of Marx between his youth and his old age ,the View of relationship between Marx and Hegel ,the analysis of the cause of drastic changes in the Soviet Union and East-ern Europe ,the knowledge of Marxist socialism ,and the role of Iring Fetscher in the western marxologist formation ,and so on . In a word ,there were three drawbacks about Iring Fetscher research ,that is ,the shortage of the specialized study to Iring Fetscher ,the severe deficiency of translation to his works and papers ,and lack of academic quality .

从叙事理论的角度对费孝通先生的传统民族志经典《江村经济》和林耀华先生的实验民族志经典《金翼》进行比较分析，可以看出传统民族志创作的学术严谨性，同时叙事模式也略显古板；而实验民族志却可以通过体例的创新---小说，使民族志的创作更加灵活，人物的刻画更加生动，所阐释的文化呈现出开放性和动态性特点。笔者试图找出两部民族志呈现出的不同特色，以及两部存在巨大差异的作品依然能够成为民族志代表作的原因。

In this article,we have a Comparative analysis between the classic of traditional ethnogra-phic Economy of Jiang Village by Feixiaotong and the classic of experimental ethnography Gold Wing by Linyaohua from the perspective of narratology. The academic rigour on the creation of traditional ethnogra-phy can be seen clearly,while its slighly stuffy narrative mode is fully exposed as well. On the contrary, the experimental ethnography can make the creation of ethnography more vivid with an Innovative style, namely,the novel. And the characteristics of openness and dynamic also appear naturely in the culture in-terpreted. I write this paper trying to figure out the different characteristics presented by this two ethnogra-phy,and eliminate the doubt why the two classics differ so sharply ,but both of them are still able to be the representatives of ethnography.

目的 探究带状疱疹患者使用阿昔洛韦、伐昔洛韦和利巴韦林等三种不同抗病毒药物实际应用中成本-疗效分析,为临床用药提供指导意义.方法 选取自2009年3月到2014年5月来我院就治并确诊为带状疱疹患者126例,采用随机抽样分为三组,其中A组采用阿昔洛韦抗疱疹病毒药物治疗,B组采用伐昔洛韦抗疱疹病毒药物治疗,C组采用利巴韦林广谱抗病毒药物治疗,观察分析三组患者临床有效率和治疗成本状况并计算成本/效果比.结果 治疗结束后,三组(A、B、C)患者治疗成本费分别为594.23±96.75元、721.77±101.32元、518.46±89.16元,相互之间存在显著统计学差异(t =6.003,3.729,9.509,P＜0.01).治疗效果方面,A组有效率(84.78％)和B组有效率(92.68％)远远超过C组有效率(71.79％),但A、B两组间不存在差异(x2=1.330,P＞0.05).住院时间上,A组患者要高于B组(t=2.254,P＜0.05),成本-效果比方面,A组(696.06)小于B组(772.11).结论 衡量治疗成本和疗效,从长远看,阿昔洛韦可以作为治疗首选药物,近期快速控制方面,伐昔洛韦可以作为首选药物.

Objective To analysis the cost and antiviral drug efficacy of herpes zoster patients using acyclovir,valaciclovir and Leigh Bhave Lin,and to provide guidance for clinical treatment.Methods 126 patients diagnosed as herpes zoster were selected by random sampling and were divided into three groups from March 2009 to May 2014 in the hospital,group A using acyclovir resistant herpes simplex virus drug therapy,group B with valacyclovir against herpes simplex virus drug therapy,and group C with Leigh Bhave Lin broad-spectrum antiviral drug treatment.Clinical efficiency and cost of treatment status of the three groups patients were analyzed and the cost/effect ratio was calculate.Results After the treatment,three groups (A,B,C) of patients with treatment costs were respectively 594.23 + 96.75 yuan,721.77 ± 101.32 yuan,518.46 ± 89.16 yuan.There was significant difference between each other (t =6.003,3.729,9.509,P =0.000 ＜0.01).For the effect of treatment,the effective rate of A gr