南宋初年,抗金名将曲端因与张浚战略方针不合,加之王庶诬陷其谋反,被投狱致死。后代史论多对其功过是非进行正反两面的人物评说,以至于曲端之死似成为千古悬而未决的冤案。曲端之死与张浚"猜忌"或王庶诬陷关系不大,实出于曲端专横跋扈、不服从上司及彭原店之败,其根本原因在于曲端的这些政治品格或政治经历,与南宋初年宋高宗政权建构稳定的中央政权这一政治本位背道而驰。

In the early Southern Song Dynasty, Qu Duan is Zhang Jun killed.On his merits and demerits, so far there exist two kinds of comment.The Death of Qu Duan, in fact, out of his imperious, insubordination leadership and Pengyuandian Defeat, the fundamental reason is that the political character of him , and the Southern Song Dynasty to construct a stable central government con-flict.

南宋伊始,宋金和战问题就一直是困扰着南宋政权的时代命题。绍兴十二年缔结的宋金和议,并没有成为维系宋金长久稳定关系的基础。绍兴三十一年,金人单方面撕毁协约南侵,加之随即登基的宋孝宗锐意恢复,宋金战争一度爆发并持续到隆兴元年张浚符离兵溃。在此期间,宋孝宗选人用事并不局限于道义型主战派士大夫,对实务型主和派士大夫及主守派政治元老也多加选用;在此之后,宋孝宗迫于符离兵败的政治压力与金人议和,锐意恢复政策主张转换为内修以图恢复的长远政治谋略。宋孝宗以邪正为标准的多元用人政策,与其对金强硬的政治主张既统一又矛盾,这种复杂的政策取向既切合即时的宋金政治局势,也为南宋制定内修以图恢复的长远国策埋下了伏笔。

In the beginning of the Southern Song Dynasty, Song-Jin Relationship was the time puzzle for Southern Song regime. In Shaoxing 12 years, Song and Jin signed Armistice treaty, but it did not become the sustainable Song-Jin Relationship foundation. In Shaoxing 31 years, Jin tore the treaty and moved southward. Song Xiaozong forge regain lost ground, Song and Zhang war broke out again, which continued until Fuli defeat. During this period, Song Xiaozong used wider appointment of personnel;After this, because of the political pressure, they signed Longxing Agreement, and the battle policy also converted to long-term recovery policy. Song Xiaozong as the Evil and the positive employment standards, is consistent with the prevailing political situation, which also provided the Southern Song Dynasty with a chance to develop a long-term national policy foreshadowed.