观察不同取穴治疗脑卒中后足内翻的疗效。方法:对80例符合标准的脑卒中后足内翻患者,随机分成独取足少阳经穴组和常规取穴组,每组40例。每日治疗1次,10次为一疗程,疗程之间间隔2天,连续治疗3个疗程。两组均在治疗前后以Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分量表及修订的Barthel指数评分量表为指标进行疗效评定。结果:两组自身在治疗前后比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗3个疗程后,独取足少阳经穴组的Fugl-Meyer运动功能评分、Barthel指数评分改善明显优于常规针法组,比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:两种针法均能改善脑卒中后足内翻患者的运动功能及生活能力,且独取足少阳经穴组见效快,疗效更优。
Objective:To observe the curative effect of different choice of acupoints for strephenopodia after stroke .Method s:80 patients with strephenopodia after stroke were randomly divided into Foot -Shaoyang me-ridian group and routine acupoint group , with 40 patients in each group .Both groups were treated once each day, 10 times as a single therapeutic course , after two days interval start another course ,three courses in all. Before and after treatment , we observed curative effect in both groups by Fugl -Meyer motor function rating scale and revised Barthel index scale .Results:Each group had differences before and after treatment and there was a statistical significance ( P<0 .05 ) .After three courses of treatment , Fugl-Meyer motor scores and Bar-thel Index scores were both improved significantly in Foot -Shaoyang meridian group compared with routine acupoint group , and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0 .05 ) .Conclusion:Both therapies can im-prove motor function